🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, threatening messages recurred. Originally, reportedly from a former police officer and a former defense officer, and then from the authorities. Ultimately, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh states he was called to law enforcement headquarters and instructed bluntly: keep quiet or experience severe repercussions.

This third-generation resident is part of a group opposing a multimillion-dollar project where this historic settlement – a massive informal community with rich history – will be demolished and transformed by a large business group.

"The distinctive community of this area is like nowhere else in the world," says the protester. "But their intention is to destroy our social fabric and silence our voices."

Dual Worlds

The cramped lanes of this community sit in stark contrast to the high-rise structures and Bollywood penthouses that dominate the settlement. Dwellings are built haphazardly and frequently missing basic amenities, informal businesses produce dangerous fumes and the air is permeated by the unpleasant stench of exposed drainage.

Among some individuals, the prospect of a renewed Dharavi into a glistening neighborhood of high-end towers, well-maintained green spaces, shiny shopping centers and homes with multiple bathrooms is a hopeful vision come true.

"We lack proper healthcare, paved pathways or drainage and we have no places for children to play," states A Selvin Nadar, in his fifties, who relocated from his home state in that period. "The sole solution is to demolish everything and construct proper housing."

Local Protest

But others, including this protester, are fighting against the redevelopment.

All recognize that Dharavi, consistently overlooked as unauthorized settlement, is desperately requiring economic input and modernization. However they are concerned that this initiative – absent of resident participation – is one that will turn valuable urban land into an elite enclave, displacing the disadvantaged, migrant communities who have resided there since generations ago.

These were these marginalized, migrant workers who established the uninhabited area into a frequently examined example of local enterprise and commercial output, whose economic value is valued at between a significant amount and $2m annually, making it a major unofficial markets.

Relocation Worries

Among approximately one million residents living in the packed 220-hectare area, a minority will be able for replacement housing in the development, which is expected to take a significant period to accomplish. Others will be moved to undeveloped zones and coastal regions on the distant periphery of the metropolis, risking fragment a long-established social network. Certain individuals will be denied housing at all.

People eligible to remain in the neighborhood will be given units in tower blocks, a major break from the organic, communal way of living and working that has maintained this area for many years.

Industries from garment work to pottery and recycling are projected to decrease in quantity and be transferred to an allocated "business area" separated from residential areas.

Existential Threat

For those such as Shaikh, a workshop owner and long-time of his family to live in the slum, the redevelopment presents a fundamental risk. His makeshift, multi-level workshop makes leather coats – sharp blazers, luxury coats, studded bomber jackets – distributed in premium stores in south Mumbai and overseas.

Household members dwells in the rooms underneath and employees and sewers – workers from north India – live in the same building, allowing him to afford their labour. Away from this community, housing costs are frequently significantly more expensive for basic accommodation.

Threats and Warning

At the government offices in the vicinity, a conceptual model of the Dharavi project illustrates a contrasting outlook. Slickly dressed residents gather on bicycles and e-vehicles, acquiring western-style bread and pastries and socializing on an outdoor area outside a restaurant and dessert parlor. This represents a world away from the inexpensive idli sambar morning meal and budget beverage that supports the neighborhood.

"This is not improvement for us," says the protester. "This constitutes a huge real estate deal that will make it unaffordable for us to survive."

Additionally, there exists concern of the corporate group. Run by a powerful tycoon – one of India's most powerful and a supporter of the national leader – the corporation has faced accusations of crony capitalism and questionable practices, which it disputes.

Although local authorities describes it as a collaborative effort, the developer paid $950m for its controlling interest. A case claiming that the project was unfairly awarded to the business group is being considered in India's supreme court.

Continued Intimidation

From when they initiated to vocally oppose the project, protesters and community members claim they have been subjected to ongoing efforts of coercion and warning – involving messages, direct threats and insinuations that speaking against the project was tantamount to opposing national interests – by figures they allege work for the corporate group.

Included in these alleged to have issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c