🔗 Share this article

Following a significant regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a prior decision that prevented viewers in Australia from accessing recorded content of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was lodged by Elon Musk's social media platform, which contested an order sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Details of the Case and Ban

Following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the eSafety commissioner petitioned the review board to officially classify the circulating video. It first determined the content was "unable to be classified", a rating that allowed the commissioner to order platforms to geo-block the videos for an Australian audience.

The platform X filed an appeal for two separate videos related to the Kirk incident. It also appealed a similar ruling on another piece of footage—depicting the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been classified as "refused classification".

The Platform's Case and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X contended that the footage in question contained only brief violence with the weapon not shown. The company noted the footage was grainy and the focus shifted rapidly from the victim to the bystanders.

X maintained the footage was not overly graphic, gratuitous, or offensive, adding that it served as a factual documentation of "a significant incident of public importance that prompted widespread discussion". X even compared the footage and the historic film of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The majority of the review board ultimately agreed that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. However, they noted that a longer or clearer version with different editing could have met that threshold. As a result, the board changed the classification of the videos to R18+.

The Minority Opinion

Some on the board disagreed, contending the video was "a shareable video for the likely purposes of entertainment and/or benefit (such as likes, shares, or views)". This view stated the parallel with the Zapruder JFK film was invalid, as that footage was made public years after the assassination, "after public sentiment regarding it had subsided".

Reactions to the Decision

In a statement on its official policy channel, X welcomed the ruling.

"We challenged this case to uphold free speech and the importance of public access about matters of public significance. We remain dedicated to protecting these fundamental values."

Representatives for the safety regulator acknowledged the ruling, but noted that the revised classification now implies platforms "have obligations to ensure R18+ material being displayed to users under 18".

Recent Developments on Violent Content

In related news, the regulator did not issue take-down orders to social media companies this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident circulating on social media. The regulator stated that while the images were distressing, they did not reach the required standard for a "refused classification" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to apply warning labels and screens, such as blurring, on this material in accordance with their existing community guidelines.