🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting modifications of a proposed legislation that include lowering the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Last month, WHO officials raised concerns that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying worldwide. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be decreased to 30% or 50% “following international guideline limits”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for multiple violations “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary states the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We reside in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which enable interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The company was “not resisting legislation”, they said, adding that young individuals should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to achieve intended population health targets, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, noting that the company's suggestions “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which encompasses rising levels of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.